Medical Negligence - Supreme Court's Verdict >>

AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3280

(From: Punjab and Haryana)* R. C. LAHOTI, C.J.I., C. K. THAKKER AND   P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAM, JJ.

Civil Appeal No. 5128 of 2002, D/- 25-8-2005

State of Punjab, Appellant v. Shiv Ram and others, Respondents.

(A) Medical Council Act (102 of 1956), S. 20-A Doctor Negligence Compensation Pregnancy despite sterilization operation _ Compensation can be awarded only if failure of operation is attributable to negligence of doctor _ Failure due to natural causes do not provide ground for claim _ If claimants opt for bearing child despite failure of operation _ they cannot claim compensation for its upbringing.

R.S.A. No. 2741 of 2001, D/- 26-7-2001 (P & H), Reversed Torts Negligence Damages.

Contract Act (9 of 1872), 8. 126

The cause of action for claiming compensation In cases of failed sterilization operation arises on account of negligence of the surgeon and not on account of child birth. Failure due to natural causes would not provide any ground for claim. It is for the woman who has conceived the child to go or

not to go for medical termination of pregnancy. Having gathered the knowledge of conception In spite of having undergone sterilization operation, If the couple opts for bearing the child, It ceases to be an un-wanted child. Compensation for maintenance and upbringing of such a child cannot be claimed.R.S.A. No. 2741 of 2001, D/- 26-7-2001 (P&H), Reversed (Para 28)

The claim for compensation in tort can be sustained only if there was negligence on the part of the surgeon in performing the surgery. The proof of negligence shall have to satisfy Bolam's test. So also, the surgeon cannot be held liable in contract unless the plain tiff alleges and proves that the surgeon had assured 100% exclusion of pregnancy after the surgery and was only on the basis of such assurance that the plaintiff was persuaded to undergo surgery. Ordinarily a surgeon does not offer such guarantee. As such a decree of damages cannot be passed In favour of the plaintiff solely on the ground that In spite of the plaintiff having under-gone a sterilization operation, she became pregnant.

(Paras 23,29)

The methods of sterilization so far known to medical science which are most popular and prevalent are not 100% safe and secure. In spite of the operation having been successfully performed and without any negligence on the part of the surgeon, the sterilized woman can become pregnant due to natural causes. Once the woman misses the menstrual cycle, It is expected of the couple to visit the doctor and seek medical advice. Section 3(2), Expin. II provides that If the woman has suffered an unwanted pregnancy, It can be terminated and this is legal and permissible under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

(Paras 26,271)

Top

<<Back  Next >>

(C) 2006 reserved by OMSA. Site Designed & Maintained by Victor Technology

 

Home | Contact Us | Site Map